# The 11 Best CPQ Software (2026)

> The best CPQ software is Salesforce Revenue Cloud, followed by Oracle CPQ and SAP CPQ.

- URL: https://topelevens.com/cpq-software
- Last verified: 2026-07-17
- Methodology: https://topelevens.com/methodology
- JSON: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/cpq-software · CSV: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/cpq-software/csv

## Ranking

### #1 Salesforce Revenue Cloud (CPQ) · 9.2/9.4
- Best for: Salesforce customers that want configuration, pricing, and quoting native to the CRM and connected to billing.
- San Francisco, USA · founded 2013 · $$$$$ (From ~$75/user/mo, quoted enterprise)
- Salesforce Revenue Cloud is the best CPQ for Salesforce shops because configuration, pricing, and quoting run on CRM data and extend into billing, keeping quote-to-cash on one platform.
- Pro: Deep native CRM integration means product, pricing, and approval data live with the opportunity, and Revenue Cloud extends the flow into billing and revenue.
- Con: It is complex to implement well and often needs a certified partner, and value is highest only for Salesforce customers.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #2 Oracle CPQ · 8.9/9.4
- Best for: Enterprises with complex products that want a proven configurator tied to Oracle CX and ERP.
- Austin, USA · founded 2005 · $$$$$ (Enterprise licensing, quoted annually)
- Oracle CPQ is the best fit for complex manufacturing and high-tech catalogs, with a powerful rules engine and tight links to Oracle ERP for order and pricing accuracy.
- Pro: The configuration and constraint engine handles highly complex products, and native ties to Oracle ERP keep pricing and orders accurate end to end.
- Con: It suits large enterprises and carries the cost and implementation weight to match, which is heavy for smaller teams.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #3 SAP CPQ · 8.7/9.4
- Best for: SAP-centric enterprises that need quoting connected to S/4HANA and SAP commerce and billing.
- Walldorf, Germany · founded 2005 · $$$$$ (Enterprise licensing, quoted annually)
- SAP CPQ is the best choice for SAP-run enterprises, connecting configuration and pricing to S/4HANA and SAP commerce so quotes reflect live ERP pricing and availability.
- Pro: Tight integration with S/4HANA and SAP commerce keeps pricing, discounts, and orders consistent from quote to fulfillment.
- Con: Its strengths depend on the SAP ecosystem, and standalone buyers gain less than SAP-committed ones.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #4 Conga CPQ · 8.6/9.4
- Best for: Salesforce teams that want strong configuration and document generation with Conga's contract and quoting heritage.
- Broomfield, USA · founded 2006 · $$$$ (Quoted per user, enterprise)
- Conga CPQ is the best pairing of configuration and documents, combining a capable rules engine with Conga Composer-grade proposal and contract generation on Salesforce.
- Pro: The configurator handles bundles and approvals while Conga's document engine turns quotes into polished, contract-ready proposals.
- Con: It is closely tied to Salesforce, and buyers on other CRMs will find it less native.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #5 DealHub CPQ · 8.4/9.4
- Best for: Mid-market revenue teams that want fast-to-deploy CPQ with guided selling and a buyer-facing deal room.
- Austin, USA · founded 2014 · $$$ (Quoted per user, mid-market)
- DealHub CPQ is the best mid-market pick, delivering guided selling, quoting, and a shared DealRoom that speeds deals without a long enterprise implementation.
- Pro: Guided selling and the buyer-facing DealRoom shorten sales cycles, and setup is faster than enterprise suites.
- Con: For the most complex manufacturing configurations it is lighter than Oracle or Tacton.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #6 PROS Smart CPQ · 8.2/9.4
- Best for: Enterprises that want AI-driven price optimization and guidance built into the quoting process.
- Houston, USA · founded 1985 · $$$$ (Enterprise licensing, quoted annually)
- PROS Smart CPQ is the best choice when pricing science matters most, using AI to recommend win-probability-based prices inside the quote flow.
- Pro: PROS's pricing heritage brings dynamic, data-driven price recommendations that lift margin and win rates on each quote.
- Con: Its edge is pricing optimization; teams whose main need is deep product configuration may weight other engines higher.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #7 Tacton CPQ · 8.1/9.4
- Best for: Manufacturers of highly configurable industrial products that need constraint-based configuration and CAD automation.
- Stockholm, Sweden · founded 1998 · $$$$ (Enterprise licensing, quoted annually)
- Tacton CPQ is the best CPQ for complex manufacturing, using a constraint-based engine and CAD automation so buyers configure machines and equipment that are guaranteed buildable.
- Pro: Constraint-based configuration plus CAD and visualization handle engineer-to-order products that rules-based tools struggle with.
- Con: It is purpose-built for industrial manufacturing, so it is over-scoped for simple SaaS or services quoting.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #8 Cincom CPQ · 7.9/9.4
- Best for: Manufacturers and complex-product sellers that want guided configuration with strong visualization.
- Cincinnati, USA · founded 1968 · $$$$ (Quoted per deployment)
- Cincom CPQ is a strong configurator for complex products, combining guided selling with 2D/3D visualization so buyers see what they configure across channels.
- Pro: Rules-based guided configuration and product visualization support manufacturing and B2B catalogs across web and rep-led channels.
- Con: Brand awareness and ecosystem are smaller than the platform leaders, so integrations may need more custom work.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #9 Subskribe · 7.7/9.4
- Best for: SaaS companies that want CPQ, billing, and revenue unified for subscription and usage-based deals.
- San Mateo, USA · founded 2020 · $$$ (Quoted per revenue team)
- Subskribe is the best fit for modern SaaS, unifying quoting, billing, and revenue recognition on one platform built for subscription and usage pricing.
- Pro: It handles ramp deals, usage-based pricing, and mid-term changes that legacy CPQ tools bolt on awkwardly, with billing and rev-rec built in.
- Con: It is a younger, SaaS-focused platform, so it is not aimed at manufacturing or hardware configuration.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #10 Vendavo · 7.5/9.4
- Best for: B2B enterprises whose priority is margin and pricing control layered onto or alongside quoting.
- Denver, USA · founded 1998 · $$$$ (Enterprise licensing, quoted annually)
- Vendavo is the best choice when margin protection leads, bringing pricing science and deal-level guidance to B2B quoting alongside its CPQ capabilities.
- Pro: Price optimization, deal guidance, and margin analytics help enterprises stop discount leakage at the point of quote.
- Con: It leans toward pricing management, so teams needing deep product configuration should pair or compare it with a stronger configurator.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

### #11 [WILDCARD] Nue.io · 7.4/9.4
- Best for: RevOps teams at product-led SaaS companies that want quote-to-revenue built around self-serve and usage pricing.
- Sunnyvale, USA · founded 2021 · $$$ (Quoted per revenue team)
- Nue.io is the contrarian pick, rethinking CPQ as a quote-to-revenue layer for product-led and usage-based businesses rather than a classic sales-rep configurator.
- Pro: It ties self-serve, sales-led, and usage pricing into one revenue lifecycle on Salesforce, fitting modern PLG motions legacy CPQ was not built for.
- Con: It is an early-stage vendor with a narrower focus, so enterprises with complex hardware configuration should look elsewhere.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-07-17): No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-17.

## FAQ

**What is the best CPQ software?**

For most enterprises already on Salesforce, the best CPQ software is Salesforce Revenue Cloud, because configuration, pricing, and quoting run natively on CRM data and extend into billing. Oracle CPQ is the strongest option for very complex product catalogs tied to ERP, and DealHub is the best pick for mid-market teams that want fast deployment and guided selling.

**How much does CPQ software cost?**

Entry pricing for platforms like Salesforce Revenue Cloud starts around $75 per user per month, but real cost is driven by implementation. Mid-market tools such as DealHub deploy in weeks at moderate per-user pricing, while enterprise suites from Oracle, SAP, and PROS are quoted annually and frequently reach six figures once configuration and integration work are included.

**Do I need CPQ if I already have a CRM?**

A CRM tracks the deal but does not enforce valid configurations or pricing rules. If your products have options, bundles, tiered discounts, or approval requirements, a CRM alone leads to quoting errors and margin leakage. CPQ adds the rules engine and approval workflows that keep quotes accurate. For very simple catalogs with one or two SKUs and fixed prices, native CRM quoting may be enough.

**What is the best CPQ for manufacturing?**

For complex manufacturing, Tacton CPQ and Oracle CPQ lead because they use constraint-based configuration and, in Tacton's case, CAD automation to ensure every configured product is actually buildable. Cincom CPQ is another strong manufacturing option with guided selling and 2D/3D visualization. These handle engineer-to-order and highly variant products that simpler rules-based CPQ tools cannot.

**What is the best CPQ for subscription or SaaS businesses?**

For SaaS and subscription models, Subskribe and Nue.io are purpose-built for recurring, ramp, and usage-based pricing, and they unify quoting with billing and revenue. Salesforce Revenue Cloud also handles subscriptions well for teams already on Salesforce. These fit better than manufacturing-oriented configurators when the challenge is recurring pricing and mid-term changes rather than physical product complexity.