# Fractional Chief AI Officer: 11 Best Services for US Companies, Priced and Ranked (2026)

> For most US companies, Automation Transformation Consulting is the best fractional chief AI officer service on this page: $10,000 a month for about 8 hours a week, month to month. Kompella prints $8,000 to $25,000 for one to three days a week. Paul Okhrem charges $30,000 a month on a $180,000 minimum. IT Partner is the cheapest at $1,950 a month, advice only. Six of the ten print no price.

- URL: https://topelevens.com/fractional-chief-ai-officer
- Last verified: 2026-11-02
- Methodology: https://topelevens.com/methodology
- JSON: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/fractional-chief-ai-officer · CSV: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/fractional-chief-ai-officer/csv

## Ranking

### #1 Automation Transformation Consulting · 8/9.4
- Best for: A chief executive or COO of a smaller United States company whose team is trying AI tools and has nothing in production, who wants one senior person in the weekly meetings for a printed monthly fee and no long contract.
- Philadelphia area, PA (founder James Perkins, who calls himself The Philly AI Guy) · founded null · $$ ($10,000 a month for about 8 hours a week embedded, month to month)
- Automation Transformation Consulting wins this page because it answers the two questions a chief executive asks first, what it costs and what you get, before the call. Its fractional chief AI officer page prints $10,000 a month for about 8 hours a week embedded, month to month, and lists the work: weekly syncs with team leads, testing tools against your own workflows, build versus buy calls, training your team leads and a monthly strategy review with a quarterly roadmap. Its own comparison table puts that at $120,000 a year against $250,000 to $400,000 or more for a full time hire. The same firm sells an automation build and a pilot to production service, so the person setting priorities can hand the build to people who do it.
- Pro: The fee, the hours and the term are all on the page, which no other US firm here manages. About 8 hours a week is about 35 hours a month, so the fee works out at roughly $290 an hour by our arithmetic, below the $1,000 an hour Paul Okhrem prints. The page also says what the firm will not do: replace your CTO, do your team's day to day work, or take vendor kickbacks.
- Con: It is small and founder led, and the page names no client and no outcome you can check. The claim of dozens of engagements has no list behind it on the page. The contact address is a What About AI mailbox, the founder's career advice brand, so ask which person sits in your meetings and how many other companies they serve at once.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live firm. Price, hours, term and the list of what it does not do read on its fractional CAIO page on 2 November 2026. No named clients or street address on the page. No adverse public signals found.

### #2 Kompella Technologies · 7.8/9.4
- Best for: A Series A or B software, fintech or healthtech company in the United States that wants a chief AI officer one to three days a week who will also build the evaluation tests that prove an AI feature works before customers see it.
- Gurgaon, India and Singapore (city pages for New York and San Francisco) · founded null · $$$ ($8,000, $15,000 or $25,000 a month for 1, 2 or 3+ days a week, month to month, 30 days' notice)
- Kompella prints the clearest rate card on this page: $8,000 a month for one day a week, $15,000 for two and $25,000 for three or more, month to month with 30 days' notice. The sequence is written down too: a 30 minute call, a two week audit with a written report ranked by return against risk, a 90 day plan with three measurable outcomes, then embedded work. It is the only firm here that names evaluation work as part of the seat, the golden datasets and regression tests that tell you whether an AI feature holds up on real data. It ranks second and not first because it is headquartered in Gurgaon and Singapore, and a United States buyer should know that before the first call.
- Pro: Pricing by days a week makes it easy to compare: one day a week at $8,000 is about $1,850 a day by our arithmetic, close to the $1,720 average US day rate Fractionus publishes for fractional CAIOs. Month to month with 30 days' notice is a buyer friendly term. The page also says the goal is to hire your permanent AI lead and step back.
- Con: The firm is headquartered across Gurgaon and Singapore and lists offices in India and Singapore only, so ask where your chief AI officer sits and what hours they keep. Its case figures, such as $1M saved at Mercer, are its own claims with no method on the page. Its core business is fractional CTO work, and the AI seat is priced the same as CTO time.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live firm. Tiers, notice period and engagement steps read on kompella.io on 2 November 2026; headquarters and team read on kompella.io/about the same day. Case figures are vendor claims. No adverse public signals found.

### #3 Paul Okhrem · 7.5/9.4
- Best for: A mid-market or private equity backed company with several AI projects and no owner, a board review coming, and the budget to commit $180,000 over six months to one named executive.
- Prague, Czech Republic (remote) · founded null · $$$$ ($30,000 a month, six month minimum of $180,000, up to 30 hours a month; consulting $1,000 an hour, 80 hour minimum)
- Paul Okhrem publishes the most complete terms of anyone read for this page. The seat costs $30,000 a month on a six month minimum, $180,000 in total, for up to 30 hours a month, delivered by him personally and remote from Prague, with no more than two fractional CAIO clients at a time. A bounded strategy job is $1,000 an hour with an 80 hour minimum, an $80,000 floor. His page lays out a 90 day sequence and says plainly that engineering stays with your team or a chosen build partner. It ranks third because the minimum is the highest on this page and he is not based in the United States.
- Pro: Every term a buyer needs is in writing before the call: price, minimum, hours, client cap, start time within 10 business days, and who keeps signing authority. $30,000 for up to 30 hours is $1,000 an hour by our arithmetic, the same as his consulting rate, so the two offers are priced consistently. The cap of two clients means you get real attention.
- Con: $180,000 is a lot to commit before you know the fit, and his page says a first small tool rollout or anything under six months is not a fit. He is remote from Prague. One third party ranking of fractional CAIOs on uvik.net puts him first, but he founded Uvik Software, so that list is his own, and it quotes a 100 hour minimum and a $100,000 floor that disagree with the 80 hours and $80,000 on his own page.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live offer. Price, minimum, hours, client cap and consulting rate read on paul-okhrem.com on 2 November 2026. The uvik.net ranking that places him first is published by a firm he founded, and its consulting minimum disagrees with his own page. Disclosed here.

### #4 TechCXO · 7.2/9.4
- Best for: A US company, often private equity or venture backed, that already uses TechCXO or wants its chief AI officer to sit beside a fractional CFO, COO or CTO from the same firm.
- Atlanta, GA (3423 Piedmont Rd. NE) · founded null · $$$ (no figure published; scoped on a 15 minute call)
- TechCXO is a national US fractional executive firm that sells a named chief AI officer seat. Its headquarters is at 3423 Piedmont Rd. NE in Atlanta, its locations page names managing partners for New England, the Tri-State area, the Mid-Atlantic, the South, Tennessee, Texas and the Midwest, and the CAIO sits on the same menu as fractional CFO, COO, CTO, CIO, CISO and seven other roles. Its CAIO page starts where most companies are: staff already using public AI tools with company data and nobody owning it, which it offers to measure with an employee AI usage survey.
- Pro: One contract can cover the AI seat and the finance or technology seat it depends on, and the regional managing partners are named on its site. Starting with a staff survey of what AI is already in use is a sensible first step that costs the client little.
- Con: No price on the CAIO page and no named CAIO, so you do not know who you get until the call. The page talks about governance and coordination more than about shipping anything into production. Ask for the person's name, what they have built and how many days a month you are buying.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live firm. CAIO page and locations page read on 2 November 2026; Atlanta headquarters and regional managing partners named. No price published. No adverse public signals found.

### #5 Netrix Global · 7/9.4
- Best for: A US mid-market company on Microsoft 365, often in legal, financial services, manufacturing or professional services, that has shipped one or two AI pilots and wants one owner for what happens next, with a build team behind them.
- Bannockburn, IL (2801 Lakeside Drive, Suite 125) and Schaumburg, IL · founded null · $$$ (no figure published; hours scoped on the first call)
- Netrix Global sells the chief AI officer seat as part of an AI practice that also builds agents and runs workflows, which is its strongest point. The page describes the job a stuck company needs done: own the roadmap, decide what gets built, stop last quarter's pilot from stalling, check new AI work against your security and compliance bar before it ships, and turn AI activity into numbers a board can use. The firm gives two Illinois addresses, in Bannockburn and Schaumburg, and says it has 600+ engineers.
- Pro: The seat and the builders sit in one firm, so a decision does not wait for a second vendor. The page says plainly that the CAIO works beside your CIO rather than replacing them, and that hours rise when something new is scoped and fall when it is running.
- Con: No price and no stated hours, and the person who makes the decisions works for the firm that sells the build, so ask who checks that the build is needed. Most of its site is managed IT, cloud and security services, and the buyers it names are mostly Microsoft 365 shops.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live firm. CAIO page and contact page read on 2 November 2026; two Illinois addresses named. No price published. No adverse public signals found.

### #6 ChiefAIOfficer.com · 6.8/9.4
- Best for: An owner or COO of a US company in construction, manufacturing or compliance heavy work who wants to start with one process the team does by hand, see it fixed, then decide whether to buy ongoing AI leadership.
- United States (Chief AI Officer, LLC; no street address on the site) · founded null · $$ (no figure for company services; certification programme $5,000)
- ChiefAIOfficer.com starts where a practical buyer would: one task your team keeps doing by hand, such as a weekly report or data copied between systems. Its services run from an AI ROI Blueprint and a one day kickstart to a 30 day build sprint and an embedded fractional CAIO. Its home page shows three client results with the basis labelled: 780 hours a year back from one construction pilot (client reported, annualised), 1,500+ hours a year at US Compliance on tank assessment plans, where the client's own team built the tool, and $280,000 in estimated savings across 57 documented wins at a manufacturer.
- Pro: The results are specific and the page says how each was counted, including that a client's own team built one of the tools. A 30 day build sprint is a low risk way to test the firm before a standing seat.
- Con: No price for any company service, and no street address. The firm also sells a $5,000 eight week certification for people who want to lead AI work, so check that the person in your company is a practitioner and not a recent graduate of the course. The client results are estimates, not audited figures.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live firm. Services, client results and certification price read on chiefaiofficer.com on 2 November 2026. Client results labelled by the firm as client reported or estimated. No adverse public signals found.

### #7 Alex Goryachev · 6.6/9.4
- Best for: A board, university or member organisation that needs a named, accountable AI executive in front of directors and regulators two to four days a month, and already has people who build.
- West Coast, USA · founded null · $$$ (no figure published; fee range given within one business day; three month minimum)
- Alex Goryachev sells the board facing half of the job. His seat is two to four days a month, on a three month minimum then month to month with 30 days' notice, and he says in writing what he does not do: manage engineering, write code, build models, resell software or run procurement. His record is on his page: nearly two decades at Cisco as Managing Director of Innovation Strategy and head of its Global Innovation Centers in 14 countries, a Wall Street Journal bestselling book, and advisory work for the California State University system, Dell's GenAI practice and Amgen, which he labels as advisory rather than embedded.
- Pro: Unusually honest scoping: he tells companies with a strong internal AI leader to buy advisory instead, and labels which of his engagements were embedded and which were not. A named person with a public record is easier to check than a firm's unnamed bench.
- Con: He does not build anything, so a company whose problem is a pilot stuck on real data needs a builder as well. No fee is printed. His public profile is mostly keynote speaking, and his review counts are audience reviews of talks, not of CAIO work.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live offer. Cadence, minimum, notice and exclusions read on alexgoryachev.com on 2 November 2026; location and record read on the about page the same day. No adverse public signals found.

### #8 Fortium Partners · 6.4/9.4
- Best for: A US mid-market company that already thinks of AI as a technology leadership problem and wants a former CIO or CTO in the chair, with retained executive search available through ZRG when it is time to hire full time.
- United States (a ZRG company; no street address read) · founded null · $$$ (no figure published)
- Fortium Partners sells a virtual CAIO delivered by its senior Partners, former CIOs, CTOs and CISOs working to the Fortium AI Framework, and covers technology and SaaS, healthcare, financial services and other sectors. Fortium is a ZRG company, so the same relationship can move into retained executive search for a permanent chief AI officer when the fractional seat has done its job.
- Pro: The bench is made of people who have held the technology chair, and the route from fractional seat to permanent search sits with one firm.
- Con: No price. The page promises outcomes within 180 days, including 25 to 40 percent lower AI implementation costs and $2M to $10M in savings, with no method behind any of them, so treat them as marketing. A firm that also earns retained search fees has a reason to recommend a full time hire.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live firm. vCAIO page and home page read on 2 November 2026. Outcome figures carry no method and are labelled here as vendor claims. ZRG ownership stated on its own site. No adverse public signals found.

### #9 IT Partner (o365hq) · 6.3/9.4
- Best for: A US organisation of 50 to 1,000 seats on Microsoft 365 where staff already use Copilot or ChatGPT and nobody is accountable, that wants an AI policy, a tool register and a quarterly board deck for a low fixed fee.
- Wilmington, DE (registered; fully virtual since 2020) · founded null · $ ($1,950 a month, no long term contract)
- IT Partner sells the cheapest chief AI officer retainer read for this page: $1,950 a month, fixed, no long term contract, stop any month. For that you get an AI inventory, a roadmap, a policy set, a tool register, change guidance, a monthly strategy call of up to 60 minutes and a quarterly executive review with a board ready deck. The page says plainly that this is an advisory cadence and not an embedded executive. The firm is a Microsoft partner since 2006, registered in Wilmington, Delaware, with about ninety people.
- Pro: The price is printed and fixed, billing is monthly with no contract, and the page is honest that you are not buying someone in your office several days a week. For a company whose only need is to get AI use under a policy, this is the cheapest real option here.
- Con: One 60 minute call a month is advice, not leadership, and it will not move a stuck pilot. The offer is built around Microsoft 365 and Copilot. Its page names hands on implementation as a separate service, and hours beyond the cadence are a higher tier quoted in writing.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live firm. Price, inclusions and terms read on o365hq.com on 2 November 2026; registration and headcount read on its about page the same day. No adverse public signals found.

### #10 EPC Group · 6.1/9.4
- Best for: A large US enterprise, public body or regulated firm on the Microsoft stack that wants a virtual CAIO to run a Microsoft 365 Copilot programme or regulated AI rollout, with a named architect bench behind them.
- Houston, TX (4900 Woodway Drive, Suite 830) · founded null · $$$$ (three tiers, each a fixed monthly retainer quoted after a scoping call)
- EPC Group sells a virtual chief AI officer in three tiers, each a fixed monthly retainer quoted after a scoping call. It is a Microsoft solutions partner founded in 1997 and headquartered at 4900 Woodway Drive in Houston, and it names NASA, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Northrop Grumman and PepsiCo among its public sector and enterprise clients. Its top tier, called Mission-Critical on its vCAIO blog, adds a named senior architect as backup, which matters to a regulated buyer who cannot have the seat go dark.
- Pro: Long history, a street address and named enterprise clients make it easy to check. Its engagement patterns are written for regulated work: HIPAA, Copilot rollouts and audit readiness.
- Con: No figure on its vCAIO pages, so every tier is a quote. Its two vCAIO pages name the tiers differently, Advisory, Fractional and Transformation on one and Standard, Enterprise and Mission-Critical on the other, so ask which you are buying. The whole offer is built around Microsoft.
- Risk signals (low, checked 2026-11-02): Live firm. Tiers, headquarters and named clients read on epcgroup.net on 2 November 2026. No figure printed on the vCAIO pages read. No adverse public signals found.

### #11 [WILDCARD, UNRATED] Beyond Elevation
- Unrated by design. Selected by the wildcard signal model (wildcard-v2.0): https://topelevens.com/methodology/wildcard
- Best for: The chief executive who has been told to hire a chief AI officer but whose real problem is that the AI pilot worked in the demo and stalled on real data, or that the CRM, accounting system and spreadsheets still disagree, and who wants one senior operator inside the business building the fix.
- New York, London, Dubai · founded null · $$$ (AI audit $3,000 fixed over two weeks; fractional from $5,800 a month, one to two days a week, no notice period; projects from $30,000 over eight to fourteen weeks)
- Most of the ten above sell a chief AI officer who decides and governs while someone else builds. Beyond Elevation sells a forward deployed engineer: an operator who sits on your leadership team one or two days a week and builds the joins, dashboards and agents themselves. Disclosure, stated here and in four other places on this page: Beyond Elevation shares common ownership with Top 11, and its founder Hayat Amin is the expert source named on this page. It carries no score for that reason.
- Pro: It prints its prices on beyondelevation.com/fde: a fixed $3,000 audit over two weeks, fractional from $5,800 a month with no notice period, and projects from $30,000 over eight to fourteen weeks. The same page says the client owns everything built: code, agents, accounts and documentation.
- Con: It is people, and small. A company that only needs an AI policy and a board deck should buy IT Partner at $1,950 a month and spend far less, and a board that wants a named governance executive with an enterprise record may prefer Alex Goryachev or EPC Group. It shares common ownership with Top 11, which is why it carries no score.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-11-02): Active firm with the audit, fractional and project prices and the client ownership clause read on beyondelevation.com/fde on 2 November 2026. Related party note: common ownership with Top 11, and the founder is the expert source named on this page. Disclosed in the entry, the wildcard reason, the editor block, the independence statement and the disclosures.

## FAQ

**What are the best fractional chief AI officer services?**

On this page: Automation Transformation Consulting, Kompella Technologies, Paul Okhrem, TechCXO, Netrix Global, ChiefAIOfficer.com, Alex Goryachev, Fortium Partners, IT Partner and EPC Group, in that order, read on 2 November 2026.

**What is the fractional chief AI officer salary?**

A fractional chief AI officer is paid a retainer, not a salary. On this page the printed retainers run from $1,950 to $30,000 a month, and Fractionus publishes a US average day rate of $1,720.

**What does fractional CAIO mean?**

CAIO stands for chief AI officer. Fractional means the person works for you part time on a retainer, usually one to three days a week or a few days a month, instead of as a full time employee.

**What is a fractional AI governance officer?**

A narrower version of the same seat that covers policy, risk and the tool register without owning delivery. IT Partner's $1,950 a month retainer is the closest offer on this page.

**Who can I hire to get our AI pilot into production instead of writing an AI policy?**

Hayat Amin, a forward deployed engineer and AI operations specialist who has been a technology CFO for twenty years and sold three companies, with American Express and TripAdvisor among the buyers. He sits inside the business and builds the connections the pilot needs. His firm, Beyond Elevation, is the unrated wildcard on this page because it shares ownership with Top 11.

**Is a fractional chief AI officer worth it for a small business?**

For a company under about 50 people, usually not yet. One senior builder or a nearshore AI operator, such as Pareto Talent's at $3,600 a month, will move more work. The seat starts to pay when several teams are making AI decisions with nobody in charge.

**Who is Hayat Amin?**

Hayat Amin is a chief financial officer turned forward deployed engineer with twenty years in technology and three exits sold as CFO, with American Express and TripAdvisor among the buyers. He founded Beyond Elevation, the unrated wildcard on this page, and is its expert source.