# The 11 Best Telehealth Platforms

> The best telehealth platform for most providers is Doxy.me for its simplicity and free tier, followed closely by Teladoc Health for enterprise scale and Amwell for its comprehensive service offerings.

- URL: https://topelevens.com/telehealth-platforms
- Last verified: 2026-05-31
- Methodology: https://topelevens.com/methodology
- JSON: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/telehealth-platforms · CSV: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/telehealth-platforms/csv

## Ranking

### #1 Doxy.me · 9.3/9.4
- Best for: Solo practitioners and small clinics needing a simple, secure, and free or low-cost solution for video visits without complex integrations.
- Rochester, USA · founded 2014 · $ ($0 to $50/mo)
- Doxy.me ranks first for its unparalleled simplicity and robust free tier, making secure, browser-based telehealth accessible to any practice, regardless of size or budget.
- Pro: The platform's 'no download required' approach for patients creates a nearly frictionless experience, significantly lowering barriers to care.
- Con: Its strength in simplicity means it lacks deep EHR integrations and the advanced practice management features found in more comprehensive suites.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #2 Teladoc Health (Solo Platform for Providers) · 9.1/9.4
- Best for: Large health systems and hospitals requiring a scalable, enterprise-grade platform with a wide range of specialty-specific hardware and clinical services.
- Purchase, USA · founded 2002 · $$$$ (Custom enterprise pricing)
- Teladoc Health is the best choice for large-scale healthcare organizations due to its market-leading enterprise platform, deep integration capabilities, and comprehensive clinical program support.
- Pro: The platform's purpose-built hardware and software for various specialties, from tele-ICU to dermatology, are unmatched in the industry.
- Con: Its cost and complexity make it inaccessible and overkill for small practices, and the focus is squarely on large, system-level deployments.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #3 Amwell · 8.9/9.4
- Best for: Health systems and payers looking for a highly configurable and comprehensive telehealth ecosystem that bridges virtual and in-person care.
- Boston, USA · founded 2006 · $$$$ (Custom enterprise pricing)
- Amwell secures a top spot with its powerful, modular platform that allows large organizations to build and scale diverse telehealth programs across the entire care continuum.
- Pro: Its strong partnerships with major health plans and deep integration with EHRs like Epic make it a seamless choice for established healthcare players.
- Con: Like other enterprise leaders, Amwell's platform is not designed for small, independent practices, and its implementation can be a lengthy and resource-intensive process.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #4 SimplePractice · 8.6/9.4
- Best for: Behavioral health professionals and other wellness practitioners in private practice who want an all-in-one practice management solution.
- Santa Monica, USA · founded 2012 · $$ ($69 to $159/mo)
- SimplePractice excels by tightly integrating telehealth into a complete practice management suite, making it the best choice for therapists and solo practitioners who need scheduling, billing, and notes in one place.
- Pro: Its streamlined workflow, from client booking on a professional website to automated billing and reminders, saves practitioners significant administrative time.
- Con: The platform is highly specialized for behavioral health and wellness, making it a poor fit for other medical specialties, and it doesn't integrate with external EHRs.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #5 Zoom for Healthcare · 8.4/9.4
- Best for: Practices and health systems that prioritize familiarity and ease of use, and have the IT resources to integrate it into their existing clinical workflows.
- San Jose, USA · founded 2011 · $$$ (Starts at $200/mo)
- Zoom for Healthcare makes the list because its ubiquitous, user-friendly interface ensures high adoption rates among patients and providers, offering a reliable video connection with the necessary security layers for healthcare.
- Pro: The video and audio quality are consistently best-in-class, providing a stable and clear connection crucial for clinical consultations.
- Con: Out of the box, it's just a video tool; it lacks a virtual waiting room, patient scheduling, and other clinical features unless integrated with another application via its marketplace.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #6 Updox · 8.2/9.4
- Best for: Small to medium-sized practices seeking a unified communication platform that combines telehealth with secure text, patient reminders, and electronic fax.
- Dublin, USA · founded 2008 · $$$ (Custom pricing)
- Updox earns its spot by positioning telehealth as one component of a complete patient communication strategy, with strong EHR integrations that help streamline front-office and clinical workflows.
- Pro: Its extensive library of pre-built integrations with over 100 EHRs makes it one of the easiest platforms to add onto an existing practice tech stack.
- Con: The user interface can feel dated compared to more modern, video-first platforms, and some users report the feature set can be overwhelming.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #7 Mend · 8/9.4
- Best for: Practices focused on reducing no-show rates and automating patient intake through smart scheduling and communication tools.
- Orlando, USA · founded 2014 · $$$ (Starts around $299/mo)
- Mend stands out for its intelligent patient engagement features, using AI-powered reminders and digital intake forms to dramatically reduce no-shows and prepare patients for their virtual visits.
- Pro: The platform's ability to automatically send appointment links and handle forms ahead of time significantly reduces administrative burden and improves clinic efficiency.
- Con: The core video consultation interface is less feature-rich than some competitors, as the platform's main focus is on the surrounding patient journey.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #8 VSee · 7.8/9.4
- Best for: Organizations needing a highly customizable and flexible telehealth solution, from simple video calls to complex, multi-party workflows.
- San Jose, USA · founded 2008 · $$ ($49 to $499+/mo)
- VSee is a veteran in the telehealth space, offering a uniquely configurable platform that can be adapted for a wide variety of clinical use cases, famously including providing support to astronauts on the ISS.
- Pro: Its low-bandwidth video technology ensures a stable connection even in areas with poor internet, a critical feature for expanding access to care.
- Con: The user experience requires a software download for full functionality, which can be a barrier for less tech-savvy patients compared to browser-based rivals.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #9 Tebra (formerly Kareo) · 7.6/9.4
- Best for: Independent medical practices already using or considering the Tebra (Kareo) ecosystem for practice management, billing, and EHR.
- Newport Beach, USA · founded 2004 · $$ (Bundled with PM/EHR)
- Tebra's telehealth solution is a logical and powerful choice for small to medium-sized independent practices, as it's fully integrated within its widely-used practice management and clinical software.
- Pro: The seamless flow from scheduling a telehealth visit to charting and billing within a single system is a major efficiency gain for small practice staff.
- Con: As a feature of a larger platform, it lacks the advanced capabilities of standalone, best-of-breed telehealth solutions and is not a viable option for practices not using Tebra's core software.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #10 athenaTelehealth · 7.4/9.4
- Best for: Medical groups and practices deeply embedded in the athenahealth ecosystem who want a native, fully integrated telehealth solution.
- Watertown, USA · founded 1997 · $$$ (Add-on to athenaOne)
- athenaTelehealth is the definitive choice for practices on the athenaOne platform, offering unmatched integration that embeds virtual visits directly into existing charting, scheduling, and billing workflows.
- Pro: Because it's a native module, providers can conduct a video visit while simultaneously documenting in the patient's chart within the same window, a major workflow advantage.
- Con: The solution is only available to athenahealth customers, and its feature set is basic compared to standalone market leaders.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

### #11 [WILDCARD] Spruce Health · 7.2/9.4
- Best for: Modern practices that want to unify all patient and team communication—including phone, text, fax, and video—into a single, mobile-first application.
- San Francisco, USA · founded 2013 · $ ($24 to $79/mo)
- Our wildcard, Spruce Health, isn't just a telehealth platform but a comprehensive, HIPAA-compliant communication hub that treats video visits as one of many ways to connect with patients, reflecting a shift towards more flexible, asynchronous care models.
- Pro: Its ability to manage a practice's phone system, secure messaging, and video calls from a single app is a game-changer for mobile-first clinicians and distributed teams.
- Con: The platform's telehealth features are more basic than dedicated solutions, and it lacks the deep EHR workflow integrations of its larger competitors.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-05-31): No material public risk signals as of 2026-05-31.

## FAQ

**What is the difference between telehealth and telemedicine?**

Telemedicine specifically refers to remote clinical services, while telehealth is a broader term that includes non-clinical services like provider training, administrative meetings, and continuing medical education, in addition to clinical services.

**How much does a telehealth platform typically cost?**

Costs vary widely. Some platforms like Doxy.me offer a free, basic tier. Paid plans for solo practitioners typically range from $30 to $100 per provider per month. Enterprise solutions for hospitals can cost thousands per month, often with implementation fees.

**Is Zoom or Google Meet sufficient for telehealth?**

Special healthcare-specific versions of these platforms (Zoom for Healthcare, Google Workspace with a BAA) can be HIPAA-compliant for basic video calls. However, they lack the integrated clinical workflows, EHR connections, and patient management features of dedicated telehealth platforms.

**What are the key features to look for in a telehealth platform?**

Key features include HIPAA compliance with a BAA, a virtual waiting room, EHR integration, e-prescribing, secure messaging, and an easy-to-use interface for both patients and providers.