# The 11 Best Virtual Event Platforms (2026)

> The best virtual event platform is Bizzabo for its all-in-one enterprise capabilities, followed by Cvent for large-scale event management and Hopin for user engagement.

- URL: https://topelevens.com/virtual-event-platform
- Last verified: 2026-06-27
- Methodology: https://topelevens.com/methodology
- JSON: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/virtual-event-platform · CSV: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/virtual-event-platform/csv

## Ranking

### #1 Bizzabo · 9.2/9.4
- Best for: Enterprise marketing teams who need a single, data-centric platform to manage their entire portfolio of virtual, in-person, and hybrid events.
- New York, USA · founded 2011 · $$$$ (starts >$15,000/yr)
- Bizzabo ranks first because its Event Experience OS provides the most complete, integrated solution for enterprises managing a mix of event types. Its deep, bi-directional integrations with Salesforce and HubSpot are superior for tracking event ROI from registration to closed-won.
- Pro: The platform's 'Clique' networking feature and robust mobile app create a unified experience for both virtual and in-person attendees.
- Con: The platform's power comes with complexity; it requires a dedicated administrator and a minimum 2-week onboarding period to use effectively.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #2 Cvent · 9/9.4
- Best for: Large enterprises and professional conference organizers managing complex, city-wide events with thousands of attendees and intricate logistical needs.
- Tysons, USA · founded 1999 · $$$$$ (starts >$20,000/yr)
- Cvent is the best choice for total event program management at an enterprise scale, especially for organizations with a large portfolio of complex, in-person events that now require a virtual component. Its Attendee Hub is a mature product built on a foundation designed for massive scale, handling registrations and sessions for 100,000+ attendees reliably.
- Pro: The platform's capabilities for managing travel, hotels, and complex ticketing are unmatched by any other provider on this list.
- Con: The user interface can feel dated compared to newer platforms, and the modular pricing structure can lead to unexpected costs as you add capabilities.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #3 Hopin by RingCentral · 8.8/9.4
- Best for: Companies prioritizing audience participation and networking, aiming to replicate the spontaneous connections of an in-person event.
- Belmont, USA · founded 2019 · $$$ (starts ~$7,500/yr)
- Hopin earns its rank by offering the most intuitive and effective networking features on the market. Its signature 1-on-1 speed networking and interactive expo booths are still the benchmark for creating genuine audience connections, now backed by RingCentral's reliable infrastructure.
- Pro: The user experience for attendees is exceptionally clean and easy to navigate, reducing friction and encouraging participation within minutes of logging in.
- Con: Since the RingCentral acquisition, the platform's focus has broadened, and some of the advanced features for professional event organizers have been streamlined or removed.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #4 Webex Events (formerly Socio) · 8.5/9.4
- Best for: Organizations seeking a top-tier mobile experience for hybrid events or those already invested in the Cisco Webex ecosystem.
- San Jose, USA · founded 2016 · $$$$ (starts >$10,000/yr)
- Webex Events is the best platform for executing a seamless hybrid event, primarily due to its best-in-class, fully-brandable mobile app. The app keeps in-person and virtual attendees connected through unified chat, Q&A, and networking, all backed by Cisco's enterprise-grade security and reliability.
- Pro: The platform offers end-to-end management, including registration, and its gamification features are highly effective at driving attendee activity.
- Con: The backend interface for event setup can be less intuitive than competitors, often requiring a few sessions with a support rep to master.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #5 vFairs · 8.3/9.4
- Best for: Organizations running virtual career fairs, trade shows, and university open days that require immersive, highly customizable 3D booth experiences.
- Dallas, USA · founded 2016 · $$$ (starts ~$5,000/event)
- vFairs leads the pack for events centered around an expo hall, like job fairs or trade shows. Its visually rich, 3D animated environments and extensive booth customization options provide sponsors with tangible value and give attendees a memorable, engaging way to browse content and connect with exhibitors.
- Pro: The dedicated project management provided for every event is a significant value-add, ensuring even non-technical teams can execute a complex event successfully.
- Con: The platform's strengths in expo halls are not matched by its features for multi-track keynotes and breakout sessions, which feel less developed.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #6 Goldcast · 8/9.4
- Best for: B2B marketers who treat events as a core part of their revenue engine and demand deep, actionable data synced to their CRM.
- Boston, USA · founded 2020 · $$$$ (starts ~$15,000/yr)
- Goldcast is the top choice for B2B marketers focused on pipeline generation because it was built from the ground up to capture and sync rich attendee intent data. It tracks engagement signals like polls answered and resources downloaded, then pushes that activity directly into HubSpot or Salesforce contacts for immediate sales follow-up.
- Pro: The platform provides a highly polished, broadcast-quality look and feel for events with minimal production effort from the organizer.
- Con: Its networking and community features are less developed than platforms like Hopin or Airmeet, making it a better fit for content-focused events.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #7 BigMarker · 7.8/9.4
- Best for: Marketers who need a single, flexible platform for a wide range of virtual events, from simple webinars to complex multi-day summits.
- Chicago, USA · founded 2010 · $$ (starts ~$2,400/yr)
- BigMarker stands out for its versatility, effectively bridging the gap between a simple webinar tool and a full-featured virtual event platform. Its browser-based delivery requires no downloads for attendees, and it includes strong marketing automation features like evergreen webinars and custom landing pages.
- Pro: The platform offers one of the most feature-rich packages at its price point, including native registration, email marketing, and ticketing.
- Con: The user interface can feel crowded with options, and some users report occasional stream stability issues with very large audiences (over 10,000).
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #8 Airmeet · 7.6/9.4
- Best for: Community managers and event organizers who want to foster a strong sense of community and interaction among attendees.
- Lewes, USA · founded 2019 · $$ (starts ~$6,000/yr)
- Airmeet excels at creating a conversational, community-like atmosphere for virtual events. Its standout features are the 'Social Lounge' with virtual tables and the ability for attendees to be easily invited 'on stage', which breaks down the barrier between speakers and the audience better than most platforms.
- Pro: The pricing model is transparent and offers a free tier for small community meetups up to 50 attendees, making it very accessible.
- Con: The platform's production capabilities and backend analytics are not as advanced as enterprise-focused competitors like Bizzabo or Cvent.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #9 Zuddl · 7.4/9.4
- Best for: Brands that prioritize a unique and highly customized visual identity for their flagship virtual and hybrid events.
- San Francisco, USA · founded 2020 · $$$ (starts ~$8,000/yr)
- Zuddl's primary strength is its powerful customization engine, allowing organizers to create a visually stunning and deeply branded event experience without needing a design agency. From custom landing pages to uniquely themed virtual stages and rooms, it offers more creative control than most off-the-shelf platforms.
- Pro: The user interface is modern, clean, and intuitive for both organizers and attendees, receiving high marks for ease of use.
- Con: As a newer player in the market, its integration marketplace and third-party app support are less extensive than more established competitors.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #10 Welcome by G2 · 7.2/9.4
- Best for: Marketing teams producing high-stakes virtual events like product launches or investor days where cinematic production quality is the top priority.
- Chicago, USA · founded 2020 · $$$$ (starts >$12,000/yr)
- Welcome is the best platform when the primary goal is to deliver a stunning, television-quality broadcast. Its production tools, including elegant speaker layouts, lower thirds, and seamless transitions, are the most sophisticated in its class, allowing a small team to produce an event that looks like it was made by a professional studio.
- Pro: The platform is incredibly intuitive for speakers, with a simple, elegant backstage experience that reduces presenter anxiety and technical issues.
- Con: It is hyper-focused on the presentation experience and lacks the deep engagement, networking, and sponsorship features of all-in-one platforms.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

### #11 [WILDCARD] Bevy · 6.9/9.4
- Best for: Enterprise companies building a distributed community event program with hundreds of local chapters led by volunteer organizers.
- Palo Alto, USA · founded 2017 · $$$$$ (starts >$30,000/yr)
- Bevy is our wildcard because it's not designed for a single, large conference but to power thousands of smaller, community-led events. It solves the unique challenge of enabling, managing, and measuring a global user group program (like those for Salesforce or Duolingo) from a central platform, making it a C2C (customer-to-customer) platform rather than a B2C one.
- Pro: Its system for empowering local brand advocates with tools to run their own events while maintaining central brand control is unique in the market.
- Con: The per-seat cost for event organizers is high, and the platform is overkill and poorly suited for running a single annual marketing conference.
- Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-27): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-27.

## FAQ

**What is the average cost of a virtual event platform?**

The average cost varies widely, from around $5,000 to over $50,000 per event. Most leading platforms price on a per-event or annual subscription basis, factoring in the number of attendees and required features. Simple webinar tools can be a few hundred dollars, while enterprise platforms like Cvent or Bizzabo for a large conference can exceed $75,000.

**What is the difference between a webinar tool and a virtual event platform?**

A webinar tool is designed for one-to-many presentations, while a virtual event platform is a multi-session environment for many-to-many interaction. Virtual event platforms include features that webinars lack, such as virtual lobbies, multiple concurrent tracks, sponsor expo halls, and dedicated networking areas.

**How do you measure ROI on a virtual event?**

Measure virtual event ROI by tracking metrics tied to business goals. Key indicators include Cost Per Lead (total event cost / number of qualified leads), pipeline influence (value of sales opportunities generated from attendees), sponsor revenue, and attendee engagement scores. Platforms with strong CRM integrations are essential for accurate ROI tracking.

**Can these platforms handle hybrid events?**

Yes, most top-tier virtual event platforms now offer robust hybrid event capabilities. They provide a unified experience for both in-person and virtual attendees, often including a mobile event app for on-site participants that syncs with the virtual platform's agenda, networking, and Q&A features. Webex Events and Bizzabo are particularly strong in this area.