# The 11 Best Business VPNs > The best business VPN is Perimeter 81 (now part of Check Point), followed closely by NordLayer and Twingate for their modern approaches to secure remote access. - URL: https://topelevens.com/vpn-for-business - Last verified: 2026-06-09 - Methodology: https://topelevens.com/methodology - JSON: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/vpn-for-business · CSV: https://topelevens.com/api/lists/vpn-for-business/csv ## Ranking ### #1 Perimeter 81 (by Check Point) · 9.2/9.4 - Best for: Mid-market companies seeking a unified, cloud-native platform that combines ZTNA, VPN, and SASE features with an intuitive management interface. - Tel Aviv, Israel · founded 2018 · $$ ($8 to $16/user/mo) - Perimeter 81 ranks first for its excellent balance of powerful ZTNA/SASE features and user-friendly administration, making advanced network security accessible to IT teams without a steep learning curve. - Pro: The platform's single management console for all networking and security services simplifies policy enforcement and monitoring significantly. - Con: While pricing is competitive, costs can escalate as more advanced security features are added to the base plan. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. Acquired by Check Point in 2023, providing financial stability. ### #2 NordLayer · 9/9.4 - Best for: Small to medium-sized businesses that need a straightforward, secure remote access solution with excellent performance and an easy-to-use interface. - Vilnius, Lithuania · founded 2019 · $$ ($7 to $11/user/mo) - NordLayer earns its high rank by leveraging the robust infrastructure and security expertise of its parent company (Nord Security) to deliver an exceptionally fast and easy-to-deploy business VPN. - Pro: The client apps are intuitive for end-users, and the admin panel is clean and simple, enabling rapid deployment across a team. - Con: While rapidly adding features, it still lacks some of the advanced SASE components like FWaaS found in more mature enterprise solutions. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. ### #3 Twingate · 8.8/9.4 - Best for: Tech-forward companies looking to replace their traditional VPN with a modern, software-defined ZTNA solution that is easy to deploy and invisible to end-users. - Redwood City, USA · founded 2019 · $$ ($5 to $10/user/mo) - Twingate secures the third spot because it offers one of the most seamless paths to adopting a Zero Trust security model, abstracting away network complexity for both admins and users. - Pro: Its ability to provide direct, secure access to specific resources without routing all traffic through a central gateway significantly improves performance and user experience. - Con: As a pure ZTNA solution, it may require a mindset shift for IT teams accustomed to traditional network-level VPN management. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. ### #4 Zscaler Private Access · 8.5/9.4 - Best for: Large enterprises with complex hybrid environments that require a mature, scalable, and highly secure ZTNA solution from an established market leader. - San Jose, USA · founded 2007 · $$$$ (Quote-based) - Zscaler Private Access is a top choice for its robust, enterprise-grade ZTNA architecture that provides superior security and scalability for large, distributed organizations, albeit with higher complexity and cost. - Pro: Its cloud-native architecture effectively decouples applications from the physical network, providing seamless, secure access without placing users on the network. - Con: The platform's complexity and pricing model make it less suitable for small to mid-sized businesses without dedicated security teams. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. Publicly traded company (NASDAQ: ZS). ### #5 OpenVPN Cloud · 8.3/9.4 - Best for: Businesses that need a reliable, cost-effective, and flexible VPN-as-a-Service built on the trusted, industry-standard OpenVPN protocol. - Pleasanton, USA · founded 2002 · $$ (Quote-based, starts ~ $7/connection/mo) - OpenVPN Cloud makes the list by offering a managed, cloud-delivered version of the world's most trusted open-source VPN protocol, providing a solid foundation for secure remote and site-to-site access. - Pro: Its pricing model, based on concurrent connections rather than per user, can be highly cost-effective for organizations with many occasional users. - Con: The management interface and feature set are more basic compared to the modern UIs and integrated SASE features of top-ranked competitors. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. ### #6 GoodAccess · 8.1/9.4 - Best for: Small businesses and startups looking for an all-in-one, easy-to-manage secure access solution with transparent pricing and strong core features. - Prague, Czech Republic · founded 2020 · $$ ($7 to $11/user/mo) - GoodAccess stands out for its focus on the SMB market, offering a simple yet powerful platform that bundles ZTNA, VPN, and threat protection into an affordable and accessible package. - Pro: The platform simplifies the creation of a secure perimeter with features like dedicated static IPs and DNS filtering, which are easy to configure. - Con: Its global server network is less extensive than larger competitors, which could impact performance for highly distributed international teams. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. ### #7 Cisco AnyConnect · 7.9/9.4 - Best for: Organizations heavily invested in the Cisco ecosystem that require a proven, traditional remote access VPN client that integrates tightly with their existing network hardware. - San Jose, USA · founded 1984 · $$$ (Quote-based, requires hardware) - Cisco AnyConnect remains a relevant choice due to its deep integration with Cisco's security appliances and its long-standing reputation as a reliable, if traditional, enterprise VPN solution. - Pro: When paired with Cisco ASAs or Firepower firewalls, it provides a robust and highly configurable security posture for remote access. - Con: Its reliance on physical or virtual appliances, along with a dated user interface, makes it feel cumbersome and less agile compared to modern cloud-native solutions. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. Publicly traded company (NASDAQ: CSCO). ### #8 Fortinet FortiClient · 7.7/9.4 - Best for: Companies that have standardized on Fortinet's Security Fabric for their network security and want to extend that protection to remote endpoints. - Sunnyvale, USA · founded 2000 · $$$ (Quote-based, part of ecosystem) - FortiClient is a strong contender for organizations already committed to the Fortinet ecosystem, as it serves as a unified agent for VPN, endpoint protection, and ZTNA within their integrated Security Fabric. - Pro: The tight integration with FortiGate firewalls allows for seamless policy enforcement and visibility from the core network to the remote endpoint. - Con: As a standalone VPN, it is less compelling and can be complex to manage without the broader Fortinet Security Fabric in place. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. Publicly traded company (NASDAQ: FTNT). ### #9 Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access · 7.5/9.4 - Best for: Large global enterprises requiring a comprehensive, high-performance SASE platform that delivers consistent security to all users, regardless of location. - Santa Clara, USA · founded 2005 · $$$$ (Quote-based) - Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is a market-leading SASE solution that provides exceptional security and performance at a global scale, making it a fit for large enterprises with the budget and expertise to manage it. - Pro: The platform leverages a high-performance global network to deliver low-latency connections and a full stack of security services from the cloud. - Con: Its significant complexity, high cost, and steep learning curve make it inaccessible for most small and medium-sized businesses. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. Publicly traded company (NASDAQ: PANW). ### #10 Netgate pfSense · 7.3/9.4 - Best for: Technically proficient IT teams that want maximum control and flexibility by using a powerful, open-source-based firewall and VPN solution. - Austin, USA · founded 2012 · $ (Software is free, requires hardware/cloud instance) - Netgate's pfSense earns a spot for being a highly flexible and cost-effective solution for teams with the in-house expertise to configure and manage a powerful open-source router, firewall, and VPN gateway. - Pro: The sheer number of configuration options and packages available allows for a highly customized and powerful network security setup at a very low cost. - Con: It requires significant technical knowledge to set up and maintain securely, and it lacks the user-friendly centralized cloud management of modern SASE platforms. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. ### #11 [WILDCARD] Tailscale · 7.1/9.4 - Best for: Development teams and tech-savvy businesses that want to create a secure, flat mesh network between their devices and servers without complex firewall configuration. - Toronto, Canada · founded 2019 · $$ ($6 to $18/user/mo) - Our wildcard, Tailscale, isn't a traditional VPN but a WireGuard-based mesh network that excels at creating simple, secure, point-to-point connections between devices, making it a favorite among developers. - Pro: The setup process is remarkably simple; installing the client and logging in with an SSO provider is often all that's needed to connect devices. - Con: It lacks the granular policy controls, centralized traffic inspection, and detailed logging that larger enterprises require from a primary corporate access solution. - Risk signals (none, checked 2026-06-09): No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-09. ## FAQ **What is the difference between a business VPN and a consumer VPN?** Business VPNs offer centralized management for IT teams, dedicated IP addresses, user-level permissions, activity logging, and integration with corporate identity systems (like Okta or Azure AD). Consumer VPNs are designed for individual privacy and lack these administrative features. **Do I need a VPN if my team is fully remote?** Yes. A business VPN or a ZTNA solution is critical for a remote team. It secures the connection between your employees' devices and your company's cloud or on-premise resources, protecting sensitive data from being intercepted on insecure networks like public Wi-Fi. **Can a business VPN track employee activity?** Yes, business VPNs are designed to provide visibility to IT administrators. They can log which users connect, when they connect, from where, and which resources they access. This is essential for security audits and threat detection, not for monitoring productivity. **What is SASE and how does it relate to business VPNs?** SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) is a cloud-native security model that bundles networking and security services into a single platform. A business VPN or ZTNA is often a core component of a SASE solution, which also includes features like a firewall as a service (FWaaS), secure web gateway (SWG), and cloud access security broker (CASB).