Ashby vs Greenhouse
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026. Last verified June 9, 2026.
The short answer
Greenhouse ranks higher on Top 11 (#1 vs #4) for Recruiters and HR managing hiring pipelines. The gold standard for scalable, structured, and data-driven enterprise recruiting.
At a glance
| Ashby | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #4 / Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026 | #1 / Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026 |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Best for | Data-centric recruiting analytics | Structured, scalable enterprise hiring |
| Pricing | $$$ (Custom pricing) | $$$$ (Custom pricing) |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | New York, USA |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
Ashby
Unmatched recruiting analytics and automation for data-driven teams.
www.ashbyhq.comSee full entry in Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026
Greenhouse
The gold standard for scalable, structured, and data-driven enterprise recruiting.
www.greenhouse.comSee full entry in Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026
Methodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.