Ashby vs Pinpoint
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026. Last verified June 9, 2026.
The short answer
Ashby ranks higher on Top 11 (#4 vs #7) for Recruiters and HR managing hiring pipelines. Unmatched recruiting analytics and automation for data-driven teams.
At a glance
| Ashby | Pinpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #4 / Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026 | #7 / Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026 |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 8.6 | 8 |
| Best for | Data-centric recruiting analytics | ATS with talent marketing |
| Pricing | $$$ (Custom pricing) | $$$ (From ~$600/mo) |
| HQ | San Francisco, USA | St Helier, Jersey |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
Ashby
Unmatched recruiting analytics and automation for data-driven teams.
www.ashbyhq.comSee full entry in Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026
Pinpoint
A strong mid-market ATS with integrated employer branding features.
www.pinpoint.comSee full entry in Greenhouse vs Lever vs Workable: 11 Best Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) 2026
Methodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.