Atera vs Auvik
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software. Last verified July 5, 2026.
The short answer
Atera ranks higher on Top 11 (#2 vs #10) for MSPs and internal IT teams monitoring, patching, and supporting fleets of endpoints and servers. Unlimited-device per-tech pricing undercuts the field for lean shops.
At a glance
| Atera | Auvik | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #2 / Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software | #10 / Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Best for | Per-technician pricing for lean teams | Network monitoring and topology mapping |
| Pricing | $$ (per-technician; from ~$149/technician/mo, unlimited devices) | $$ (quote-only; per-network-device) |
| HQ | Tel Aviv, Israel | Waterloo, Canada |
| Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
Atera
Unlimited-device per-tech pricing undercuts the field for lean shops.
www.atera.comSee full entry in Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software
Auvik
Automated network discovery and topology the endpoint RMMs lack.
www.auvik.comSee full entry in Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software
Methodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.