JW Player vs TwentyThree
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of The 11 Best Video Hosting Platforms for Business. Last verified June 11, 2026.
The short answer
JW Player ranks higher on Top 11 (#7 vs #8) for Business teams hosting embeddable video. A reliable choice for publishers focused on ad-based monetization.
At a glance
| JW Player | TwentyThree | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #7 / The 11 Best Video Hosting Platforms for Business | #8 / The 11 Best Video Hosting Platforms for Business |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 7.9 | 7.8 |
| Best for | Digital publishers and monetization | HubSpot-centric marketing teams |
| Pricing | $$$ (Custom pricing) | $$$ ($499 to $1999/mo) |
| HQ | New York, USA | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Founded | 2008 | 2006 |
JW Player
A reliable choice for publishers focused on ad-based monetization.
www.jwplayer.comSee full entry in The 11 Best Video Hosting Platforms for Business
TwentyThree
Unmatched native integration for HubSpot users.
www.twentythree.comSee full entry in The 11 Best Video Hosting Platforms for Business
Methodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.