NinjaOne vs Auvik
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software. Last verified July 5, 2026.
The short answer
NinjaOne ranks higher on Top 11 (#1 vs #10) for MSPs and internal IT teams monitoring, patching, and supporting fleets of endpoints and servers. Cleanest console in the category with dependable patching and integrations.
At a glance
| NinjaOne | Auvik | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #1 / Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software | #10 / Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 9.3 | 7.9 |
| Best for | Fast, modern all-round RMM | Network monitoring and topology mapping |
| Pricing | $$ (quote-only per-device; commonly ~$3 to $4 per endpoint/mo) | $$ (quote-only; per-network-device) |
| HQ | Austin, United States | Waterloo, Canada |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
NinjaOne
Cleanest console in the category with dependable patching and integrations.
www.ninjaone.comSee full entry in Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software
Auvik
Automated network discovery and topology the endpoint RMMs lack.
www.auvik.comSee full entry in Best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Software
Methodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.