qBotica vs Ashling Partners

Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of Best AI Consulting Firms for Business Process Automation: 11 Ranked for US Companies (2026). Last verified November 5, 2026.

The short answer

qBotica ranks higher on Top 11 (#1 vs #2) for Chief executives, chief operating officers and founders of US companies with 50 to 1,000 people, technology companies first, who are choosing who will automate their back office because staff retype data between systems, invoices and claims are keyed by hand, or an automation pilot never reached production.. Process automation priced as a monthly service: 3 bots from $9,000 a month, licences and hosting included.

At a glance

qBoticaAshling Partners
Top 11 rank#1 / Best AI Consulting Firms for Business Process Automation: 11 Ranked for US Companies (2026)#2 / Best AI Consulting Firms for Business Process Automation: 11 Ranked for US Companies (2026)
Score (out of 9.4)7.87.5
Best forBack office automation bought as one monthly feeMid sized firms that need automation run 24/7 after launch
Pricing$$$ (3 bots from $9,000 a month, 5 bots from $20,000 a month, 10+ bots from $47,000 a month; build, UiPath licences, support and hosting included)Not published; starts with an Agent Assessment
HQPhoenix, Arizona (10000 N 31st Ave); offices in Chennai, India and New BrunswickChicago, Illinois (1 E Wacker Dr); offices in Toronto, Melbourne, Bucharest and Hyderabad
Founded—2017

qBotica

Process automation priced as a monthly service: 3 bots from $9,000 a month, licences and hosting included.

www.qbotica.com/services/pricing

See full entry in Best AI Consulting Firms for Business Process Automation: 11 Ranked for US Companies (2026)

Ashling Partners

A Chicago automation specialist that finds, builds and then runs your bots and agents 24/7.

www.ashling.ai/intelligent-automation-services

See full entry in Best AI Consulting Firms for Business Process Automation: 11 Ranked for US Companies (2026)

Methodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.