Cybersecurity · Security Awareness Training & Phishing Simulation
KnowBe4 vs Hoxhunt vs Proofpoint Security Awareness: 11 Best Security Awareness Training Platforms 2026
The best security awareness training platform is KnowBe4, ranked here against Hoxhunt, Proofpoint, SANS, and 7 more on phishing simulation realism, content that people actually finish, and the measurable behavior change that lowers your click rate.
The short answer
The best security awareness training platform is KnowBe4, followed by Hoxhunt and Proofpoint for phishing simulation, employee training, and measurable reduction in human-error risk.
The ranking
| Rank | Provider | Best for | Price band | Score out of 9.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KnowBe4Broadest library and automation at any size | 9.1 | ||
| 2 | HoxhuntAdaptive, gamified behavior change at scale | 8.9 | ||
| 3 | Proofpoint Security AwarenessTraining tied to real threat intelligence | 8.6 | ||
| 4 | SANS Security AwarenessDeepest expert content and role-based tracks | 8.4 | ||
| 5 | Infosec IQBroad library at mid-market pricing | 8.2 | ||
| 6 | CofensePhishing simulation wired to threat response | 8.0 | ||
| 7 | Mimecast Awareness TrainingComedic micro-training bundled with email security | 7.9 | ||
| 8 | CybeReadyFully automated, low-admin adaptive program | 7.8 | ||
| 9 | NinjioStory-driven episodic video people finish | 7.6 | ||
| 10 | Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)Simple story-based training for SMBs and MSPs | 7.4 | ||
| 11 | RiotWildcardChat-native training for modern startups | Unrated by designSignal read |
The field at a glance
What you pay against what you get. Anything up and to the left is punching above its price.
The wildcard · #11
Unrated by designRiot
This will get my team to actually complete training because it lives in Slack, but I will probably outgrow its reporting features as my company scales.
The ten above are scored against the public rubric. The wildcard answers a different question, so it carries no score. It is selected by the wildcard signal model (wildcard-v2.0), read 2026-08-26.
- Under-the-radar coefficientstrong
- The platform's Slack-native delivery model offers higher engagement for its target user than its general market awareness suggests.
- Category fit anomalyexceptional
- Riot rejects the category's standard learning management system in favor of delivering training inside existing chat tools like Slack.
- Ceiling distancenotable
- Customers will outgrow the platform when their compliance and reporting needs exceed its current, less mature enterprise controls.
- Quality-per-price percentilestrong
- Within its mid-market price band, its conversational delivery method provides superior employee engagement for Slack-native companies.
- Churn language signaturenotable
- Customers leave when their organization's growth demands more sophisticated reporting and compliance features than the platform provides.
Right for
Fast-growing tech companies whose primary internal communication channel is Slack and who prioritize engagement over compliance checklists.
Wrong for
Large enterprises in regulated industries that require deep, customizable reporting and extensive compliance mapping.
Every entry
KnowBe4
Widest library and best automation across every size.
- Best for
- Broadest library and automation at any size
- $$
- per user / year, volume-tiered
- Company
- Clearwater, USA · est. 2010
Thousands of templates plus hands-off Smart Groups automation.
Formulaic content; higher tiers get pricey fast.
- Compliance Training Gaps
- Admin Overhead
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
Hoxhunt
Best measurable drop in clicks through adaptive training.
- Best for
- Adaptive, gamified behavior change at scale
- $$$
- per user / year, enterprise
- Company
- Helsinki, Finland · est. 2016
Per-user adaptive difficulty with a strong reporting habit.
Thinner compliance library; assumes a mature program.
- High Phishing Click Rate
- Repeat Offenders
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
Proofpoint Security Awareness
Best threat-intelligence-driven, targeted training.
- Best for
- Training tied to real threat intelligence
- $$$
- per user / year, enterprise
- Company
- Sunnyvale, USA · est. 2008
Targets the highest-risk users using real attack data.
Best inside the Proofpoint stack; heavier standalone.
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
SANS Security Awareness
Best expert-built, role-specific training content.
- Best for
- Deepest expert content and role-based tracks
- $$$
- per user / year
- Company
- Rockville, USA · est. 1989
Practitioner-grade content with real role-based depth.
Simulation and automation trail dedicated phishing tools.
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
Infosec IQ
Best library-to-price ratio for mid-market teams.
- Best for
- Broad library at mid-market pricing
- $$
- per user / year, volume-tiered
- Company
- Madison, USA · est. 2004
Deep library and templates at a mid-market price.
Less adaptive; dated interface in spots.
- Compliance Training Gaps
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
Cofense
Best link between employee reports and threat response.
- Best for
- Phishing simulation wired to threat response
- $$$
- per user / year
- Company
- Leesburg, USA · est. 2008
Turns employee reports into real threat intelligence.
Thinner course library; detection over education.
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
Mimecast Awareness Training
Best add-on training for Mimecast email customers.
- Best for
- Comedic micro-training bundled with email security
- $$
- per user / year, bundled
- Company
- London, United Kingdom · est. 2003
Short, funny videos with high completion, bundled in.
Weak standalone; shallower simulation engine.
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
CybeReady
Best hands-off automation for lean teams.
- Best for
- Fully automated, low-admin adaptive program
- $$
- per user / year
- Company
- Tel Aviv, Israel · est. 2015
Autonomous, adaptive, and covers 40-plus languages.
Less content depth and manual control.
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
Ninjio
Best storytelling to lift completion and recall.
- Best for
- Story-driven episodic video people finish
- $$
- per user / year
- Company
- Westlake Village, USA · est. 2015
Cinematic episodes that people actually finish.
Light simulation, reporting, and automation.
- Low Course Completion
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
Best approachable, story-based training for SMBs.
- Best for
- Simple story-based training for SMBs and MSPs
- $
- per user / year
- Company
- Atlanta, USA · est. 2015
Approachable stories with easy SMB setup.
Limited depth and reporting for larger orgs.
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
RiotWildcard
Best chat-native training that lives where work happens.
- Best for
- Chat-native training for modern startups
- $$
- per user / year
- Company
- Paris, France · est. 2020
Conversational, Slack-delivered lessons that get finished.
Younger vendor; lighter reporting and enterprise controls.
- Low Course Completion
- Admin Overhead
Risk signals · none found›
No material public risk signals as of 2026-07-12.
Go deeper
Best pick for your situationmatched by problem
Best for Compliance Training Gaps
KnowBe4 (#1, 9.1/9.4). Widest library and best automation across every size. It also handles Admin Overhead.
Best for High Phishing Click Rate
Hoxhunt (#2, 8.9/9.4). Best measurable drop in clicks through adaptive training. It also handles Repeat Offenders.
Best for Compliance Training Gaps
Infosec IQ (#5, 8.2/9.4). Best library-to-price ratio for mid-market teams.
Best for Low Course Completion
Ninjio (#9, 7.6/9.4). Best storytelling to lift completion and recall.
Best for Low Course Completion
Riot (#11, unrated wildcard). Best chat-native training that lives where work happens. It also handles Admin Overhead.
Buyer's guide2 questions
What is a security awareness training platform?
A security awareness training platform teaches employees to spot and report attacks, then tests them with simulated phishing emails to measure whether the lessons stuck. It combines a training module library, an ongoing phishing simulator, and reporting that turns click rates and report rates into a human-risk score leadership can track quarter over quarter.
Does security awareness training actually reduce breaches?
Yes, when it is continuous rather than annual. Programs that run monthly simulations and deliver a short lesson the moment someone clicks routinely cut click rates from double digits to low single digits within a year, and phishing remains the entry point in a large share of breaches, so a lower click rate directly shrinks the attack surface.
How to choose
- 1Match to your size: KnowBe4 and Infosec IQ scale from SMB to enterprise, while Hoxhunt and Proofpoint are built for large, global workforces.
- 2Name your goal: if you need compliance evidence fast, prioritize KnowBe4 or SANS; if you need measurable behavior change, prioritize Hoxhunt or CybeReady.
- 3Check content fit: Ninjio and Curricula win on story-driven content people finish, while SANS and Proofpoint win on depth and role-based tracks.
- 4Weigh admin effort: CybeReady and Riot automate almost everything, which matters when one person runs the whole program part-time.
Frequently asked5 answers
What is the best security awareness training platform in 2026?
KnowBe4 is the best all-around security awareness training platform, because its template library, module breadth, and automated campaigns cover compliance and phishing simulation for teams from 50 to 50,000 users. Hoxhunt leads for measurable behavior change and Proofpoint for enterprises that want training tied to real threat intelligence.
What are the best alternatives to KnowBe4?
The strongest KnowBe4 alternatives are Hoxhunt for adaptive, gamified behavior change, Proofpoint for threat-intelligence-driven training, and SANS Security Awareness for the deepest expert-built content. For smaller teams that want low admin effort, CybeReady and Riot automate most of the program.
How much does security awareness training cost per user?
Most platforms price per user per year and drop sharply with volume, typically landing between roughly 10 and 40 dollars per user annually depending on tier and seat count. Enterprise and threat-intelligence-heavy tiers cost more, and several vendors quote custom pricing rather than publishing rates, so run a seat-count quote before comparing.
How often should employees do security awareness training?
Continuously, not once a year. The programs that lower risk run a phishing simulation roughly monthly and deliver short micro-lessons throughout the year, because a single annual course fades within weeks. Frequent, bite-sized reinforcement is what turns awareness into a durable habit.
Is phishing simulation enough on its own?
No. Simulation measures risk but training changes it. The platforms that reduce click rates pair each failed simulation with an immediate lesson and adapt future difficulty to the user, so simulation and training work as one loop rather than a test with no follow-up.
How this was scored
Every entry is scored on a 9.4-point scale across 5 weighted criteria, reviewed quarterly. Top 11 takes no payment from any provider on this list. Scores are computed from a public weighted rubric; methodology weights were locked before entry research began. Re-scored every 90 days.
- Most leading vendors are US-headquartered, so content localization and non-English module depth vary and can favor English-first workforces.
- Published per-user pricing is rare in this category; several vendors quote only after a seat-count and tier conversation, so ranking cannot capture your specific cost.
- Behavior-change claims come largely from vendor-reported click-rate data, which is rarely independently audited, so treat headline reduction numbers as directional.
Changelog2 edits
Wildcard policy change: the #11 wildcard is now unrated. It is selected and explained by the wildcard signal model (wildcard-v2.0), which answers a different question from the scored rubric, so a score would be misleading. The ten ranked entries are unaffected.
Initial publication. Methodology v1.0 weights Phishing Simulation Realism & Coverage (25%), Training Content Quality & Engagement (25%), Behavior Change & Adaptive Personalization (20%), Reporting, Analytics & Risk Scoring (15%), and Automation & Admin Effort (15%).
The gripe box
The only review form on this page. We publish complaints, not compliments. Right of reply guaranteed.
[KnowBe4 vs Hoxhunt vs Proofpoint Security Awareness: 11 Best Security Awareness Training Platforms 2026](https://topelevens.com/security-awareness-training). Top 11, AI-native independent ranking. Methodology public at https://topelevens.com/methodology.Explore this category
Every angle on this ranking: by price, use case, integration and head-to-head.
More rankings in this category
- QuickBooks vs Xero vs FreshBooks: 11 Best Small Business Accounting Software 2026
- HubSpot CRM vs Zoho CRM vs Freshsales: 11 Best CRM Software for Small Business 2026
- Intercom vs Front vs Help Scout: 11 Best Customer Support Software 2026
- Bitdefender vs CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne: 11 Best Cybersecurity Software for Small Business 2026
- Monday.com vs ClickUp vs Asana: 11 Best Project Management Software 2026
More ways to rank these
Best for (26)
- Enterprise
- Mid market
- Smb
- Regulated industries
- Msp delivered
- Global workforce
- Mid market it teams
- Compliance driven buyers
- Compliance training gaps
- Admin overhead
- Enterprise security teams
- Behavior change first buyers
- High phishing click rate
- Repeat offenders
- It generalists
- Smb buyers
- Culture first teams
- Communications led buyers
- Low course completion
- Slack native teams
- Fast growing startups
- Adaptive
- Gamified behavior change at scale
- Broad library at midmarket pricing
- Fully automated
- Lowadmin adaptive program
Works with
By region
Reviews
Alternatives
- Alternatives to KnowBe4
- Alternatives to Hoxhunt
- Alternatives to Proofpoint Security Awareness
- Alternatives to SANS Security Awareness
- Alternatives to Infosec IQ
- Alternatives to Cofense
- Alternatives to Mimecast Awareness Training
- Alternatives to CybeReady
- Alternatives to Ninjio
- Alternatives to Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- Alternatives to Riot
Red flags
Head-to-head (55)
- KnowBe4 vs Hoxhunt
- KnowBe4 vs Proofpoint Security Awareness
- KnowBe4 vs SANS Security Awareness
- KnowBe4 vs Infosec IQ
- KnowBe4 vs Cofense
- KnowBe4 vs Mimecast Awareness Training
- KnowBe4 vs CybeReady
- KnowBe4 vs Ninjio
- KnowBe4 vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- KnowBe4 vs Riot
- Hoxhunt vs Proofpoint Security Awareness
- Hoxhunt vs SANS Security Awareness
- Hoxhunt vs Infosec IQ
- Hoxhunt vs Cofense
- Hoxhunt vs Mimecast Awareness Training
- Hoxhunt vs CybeReady
- Hoxhunt vs Ninjio
- Hoxhunt vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- Hoxhunt vs Riot
- Proofpoint Security Awareness vs SANS Security Awareness
- Proofpoint Security Awareness vs Infosec IQ
- Proofpoint Security Awareness vs Cofense
- Proofpoint Security Awareness vs Mimecast Awareness Training
- Proofpoint Security Awareness vs CybeReady
- Proofpoint Security Awareness vs Ninjio
- Proofpoint Security Awareness vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- Proofpoint Security Awareness vs Riot
- SANS Security Awareness vs Infosec IQ
- SANS Security Awareness vs Cofense
- SANS Security Awareness vs Mimecast Awareness Training
- SANS Security Awareness vs CybeReady
- SANS Security Awareness vs Ninjio
- SANS Security Awareness vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- SANS Security Awareness vs Riot
- Infosec IQ vs Cofense
- Infosec IQ vs Mimecast Awareness Training
- Infosec IQ vs CybeReady
- Infosec IQ vs Ninjio
- Infosec IQ vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- Infosec IQ vs Riot
- Cofense vs Mimecast Awareness Training
- Cofense vs CybeReady
- Cofense vs Ninjio
- Cofense vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- Cofense vs Riot
- Mimecast Awareness Training vs CybeReady
- Mimecast Awareness Training vs Ninjio
- Mimecast Awareness Training vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- Mimecast Awareness Training vs Riot
- CybeReady vs Ninjio
- CybeReady vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- CybeReady vs Riot
- Ninjio vs Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT)
- Ninjio vs Riot
- Curricula (Huntress Managed SAT) vs Riot
Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown · CSV · Recommend API · agent guide