ITRex Group vs Azumo
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of Master of Code vs ITRex vs Azumo: 11 Best AI Agent Development Companies in the USA (2026). Last verified November 4, 2026.
The short answer
ITRex Group ranks higher on Top 11 (#2 vs #3) for Chief executives, chief operating officers and founders of US companies with 20 to 1,000 people, technology companies first, who are hiring a firm to build AI agents because an agent worked in the demo and failed on real data, or because staff still retype the same record between systems.. Prints the cost of each stage and names the measures it tests an agent against.
At a glance
| ITRex Group | Azumo | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #2 / Master of Code vs ITRex vs Azumo: 11 Best AI Agent Development Companies in the USA (2026) | #3 / Master of Code vs ITRex vs Azumo: 11 Best AI Agent Development Companies in the USA (2026) |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 7.9 | 7.5 |
| Best for | Mid sized and larger firms that want each stage priced | Companies with a wide CRM and ERP stack and a nearshore budget |
| Pricing | $$$$ (feasibility $15,000 to $40,000; proof of concept $30,000 to $80,000; production deployment around $100,000; enterprise autonomous agents from $100,000 to more than $500,000) | $$$ (no figure printed; fixed price, dedicated team or staff augmentation, says it costs 30 to 50 percent less than an equivalent US team) |
| HQ | Sacramento, California and Warsaw, Poland (no street address printed) | San Francisco, California (printed as 40 Mesa, Suite 114); engineers nearshore in South America |
| Founded | 2009 | 2016 |
ITRex Group
Prints the cost of each stage and names the measures it tests an agent against.
itrexgroup.com/services/ai-agent-development/Azumo
The longest named list of systems its agents join, with fallback paths in every build.
azumo.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-services/ai-agent-development-companyMethodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.