Master of Code Global vs ITRex Group
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of Master of Code vs ITRex vs Azumo: 11 Best AI Agent Development Companies in the USA (2026). Last verified November 4, 2026.
The short answer
Master of Code Global ranks higher on Top 11 (#1 vs #2) for Chief executives, chief operating officers and founders of US companies with 20 to 1,000 people, technology companies first, who are hiring a firm to build AI agents because an agent worked in the demo and failed on real data, or because staff still retype the same record between systems.. The clearest written plan for testing an agent and stopping it for a human, with Salesforce and Microsoft named.
At a glance
| Master of Code Global | ITRex Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #1 / Master of Code vs ITRex vs Azumo: 11 Best AI Agent Development Companies in the USA (2026) | #2 / Master of Code vs ITRex vs Azumo: 11 Best AI Agent Development Companies in the USA (2026) |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Best for | Salesforce or Microsoft shops that need approval points built in | Mid sized and larger firms that want each stage priced |
| Pricing | $$$ (no figure printed; a 30 day pilot on one workflow at a fixed budget, quoted on the call) | $$$$ (feasibility $15,000 to $40,000; proof of concept $30,000 to $80,000; production deployment around $100,000; enterprise autonomous agents from $100,000 to more than $500,000) |
| HQ | Redwood City, California (541 Jefferson Ave, Suite 100); Winnipeg, Canada | Sacramento, California and Warsaw, Poland (no street address printed) |
| Founded | 2004 | 2009 |
Master of Code Global
The clearest written plan for testing an agent and stopping it for a human, with Salesforce and Microsoft named.
masterofcode.com/ai-agent-development-servicesITRex Group
Prints the cost of each stage and names the measures it tests an agent against.
itrexgroup.com/services/ai-agent-development/Methodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.