Sterling vs ShareAble for Hires
Side-by-side from the Top 11 ranking of The 11 Best Background Check Services. Last verified June 13, 2026.
The short answer
Sterling ranks higher on Top 11 (#4 vs #11) for Employers screening candidates. Best for its specialized solutions in healthcare, finance, and retail.
At a glance
| Sterling | ShareAble for Hires | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 11 rank | #4 / The 11 Best Background Check Services | #11 / The 11 Best Background Check Services |
| Score (out of 9.4) | 8.6 | 7.1 |
| Best for | Vertical-specific screening | On-demand checks for micro-businesses |
| Pricing | $$$ (Quote-based) | $ ($25 to $60 per check) |
| HQ | New York, USA | Chicago, USA |
| Founded | 1975 | 2016 |
ShareAble for Hires
A unique on-demand model where applicants push reports to employers.
www.transunion.com/shareable-for-hiresMethodology and scoring weights live at /methodology. No vendor pays for placement — see about.