ByHayat Amin· editorial direction, Top 11Updated June 12, 2026

Sales · Proposals

The 11 Best Proposal Software

Name: The 11 Best Proposal Software (dataset)
Published: 2026-06-12
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

A ranked list of the top platforms for creating, sending, and tracking sales proposals that win deals, based on workflow automation, CRM integration, and eSignature capabilities.

Verified June 202625+ screened · 11 rankedNo paid placement

The short answer

The best proposal software is PandaDoc for its all-in-one document workflow, followed by Proposify for its design flexibility and Qwilr for its interactive web-based proposals.

✓ Independent

Top 11 takes no payment from any provider on this list. Scores are computed from a public weighted rubric; methodology weights were locked before entry research began.

↻ Verified June 2026 · re-checked quarterly

Re-scored every 90 days.

Scored on a 9.4-point scale across 5 weighted criteria, reviewed quarterly.

Citing this list?

[The 11 Best Proposal Software](https://11.market/esign-proposal-software). Top 11, AI-native independent ranking. Methodology public at https://11.market/methodology.

The Ranking

ALL 11

Ranked comparison of The 11 Best Proposal Software, with best-for segment, price band, and score out of 9.4. Updated June 2026.
#	Provider · best for	Price	Score
1	PandaDocAll-in-one document workflows	$$	9.3/9.4
2	ProposifyDesign control and branding	$$	9.1/9.4
3	QwilrInteractive web-based proposals	$$$	8.9/9.4
4	Better ProposalsSpeed and ease of use	$	8.7/9.4
5	GetAcceptProposal and sales engagement	$$$	8.5/9.4
6	DocuSign Gen for SalesforceSalesforce-native document generation	$$$	8.2/9.4
7	QuoteWerksComplex quotes for IT/VARs	$$$	8.0/9.4
8	LoopioRFP and security questionnaires	$$$$	7.8/9.4
9	NusiiSimple proposals for freelancers	$$	7.5/9.4
10	ProposableFor users of Reply.io	$$	7.2/9.4
11	Canva DocsWILDCARDVisually-driven, simple proposals	$	6.9/9.4

Best pick for your situation

Matched by the problem you're solving. Agents can query /api/lists/esign-proposal-software/recommend?problem=… or the recommend MCP tool to get these matches as structured data.

Best for All-in-one document workflow

PandaDoc (#1, scores 9.3/9.4). The best all-in-one platform for the entire proposal-to-close workflow. It also handles eSignature collection, CRM data sync.

Best for Brand consistency across proposals

Proposify (#2, scores 9.1/9.4). Unmatched design flexibility and brand management for proposals. It also handles Design-heavy proposal needs.

Best for Creating interactive, mobile-responsive proposals

Qwilr (#3, scores 8.9/9.4). Creates beautiful, interactive web proposals, not static PDFs. It also handles Embedding video and calculators.

Best for Visually stunning, simple proposals

Canva Docs (#11, scores 6.9/9.4). A design tool, not a proposal tool, but great for visual proposals. It also handles Low-cost proposal creation.

The Breakdown

9.3/9.4

PandaDoc

Best for: All-in-one document workflows$$ · $19 to $59/user/moSan Francisco, USA · est. 2013

Solves: All-in-one document workflow · eSignature collection · CRM data sync

PandaDoc: The best all-in-one platform for the entire proposal-to-close workflow.

✓Integrated, legally binding eSignature is a core strength.

✕Key CRM integrations are gated behind higher-priced plans.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: pandadoc.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

9.1/9.4

Proposify

Best for: Design control and branding$$ · $49/user/mo+Halifax, Canada · est. 2013

Solves: Brand consistency across proposals · Design-heavy proposal needs

Proposify: Unmatched design flexibility and brand management for proposals.

✓Excellent, well-organized content library.

✕Low active proposal limit on the entry-level plan.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: proposify.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

8.9/9.4

Qwilr

Best for: Interactive web-based proposals$$$ · $35 to $59/user/moSydney, Australia · est. 2014

Solves: Creating interactive, mobile-responsive proposals · Embedding video and calculators

Qwilr: Creates beautiful, interactive web proposals, not static PDFs.

✓Interactive pricing tables are a key differentiator.

✕Poor support for generating traditional PDF documents.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: qwilr.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

8.7/9.4

Better Proposals

Best for: Speed and ease of use$ · $19 to $49/user/moChichester, UK · est. 2015

Better Proposals: The fastest way to create and send professional proposals.

✓Clear, actionable per-proposal analytics.

✕Design editor is less flexible than top competitors.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: betterproposals.io · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

8.5/9.4

GetAccept

Best for: Proposal and sales engagement$$$ · Custom pricingSan Francisco, USA · est. 2015

GetAccept: Combines proposals with video and chat for higher engagement.

✓Personalized video messaging drives engagement.

✕Proposal editor is less advanced than focused tools.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: getaccept.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

8.2/9.4

DocuSign Gen for Salesforce

Best for: Salesforce-native document generation$$$ · $25/user/mo+San Francisco, USA · est. 2003

DocuSign Gen for Salesforce: Best for generating proposals directly from Salesforce data.

✓Unmatched, deep integration with Salesforce custom objects.

✕Template editor is clunky and requires technical setup.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: docusign.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

8.0/9.4

QuoteWerks

Best for: Complex quotes for IT/VARs$$$ · $15 to $29/user/mo, plus add-onsOrlando, USA · est. 1993

QuoteWerks: The go-to quoting tool for the IT services industry.

✓Deep integrations with IT distributor product catalogs.

✕Dated user interface and desktop-based application.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: quotewerks.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

7.8/9.4

Loopio

Best for: RFP and security questionnaires$$$$ · Custom pricingToronto, Canada · est. 2014

Loopio: Market leader for managing complex RFP responses.

✓AI-powered content library saves significant time.

✕Overkill and poorly suited for standard sales proposals.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: loopio.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

7.5/9.4

Nusii

Best for: Simple proposals for freelancers$$ · $29 to $129/moRemote · est. 2014

Nusii: A simple, elegant tool for freelancers and small agencies.

✓Extremely clean and intuitive user interface.

✕Very limited native CRM integrations.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: nusii.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

7.2/9.4

Proposable

Best for: For users of Reply.io$$ · $39/user/moRemote · est. 2009

Proposable: A solid, straightforward tool now part of Reply.io.

✓Simple drag-and-drop proposal builder.

✕Slower feature development than competitors.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: proposable.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

6.9/9.4

Canva DocsWILDCARD · #11

Best for: Visually-driven, simple proposals$ · $0 to $12.99/user/moSydney, Australia · est. 2013

Solves: Visually stunning, simple proposals · Low-cost proposal creation

Canva Docs: A design tool, not a proposal tool, but great for visual proposals.

✓Unmatched visual design and asset embedding capabilities.

✕Lacks all core sales proposal automation features.

✓Risk signals: No material public risk signals as of 2026-06-12.

Primary source: canva.com · Data verified June 2026

Is this ranking right?

Gripe →

Buyer's guide

What is proposal software?

Proposal software helps sales teams create, send, track, and get signatures on business proposals and quotes. It replaces manual processes using Word or PDF documents with streamlined, template-driven workflows, detailed analytics, and integrations into other sales systems like your CRM.

How does proposal software connect to a CRM?

Most proposal software connects to CRMs like Salesforce or HubSpot via native integrations or APIs. This connection allows you to automatically pull contact and deal information into a proposal, eliminating manual data entry. It also syncs proposal status (viewed, signed) back to the CRM, giving sales leaders a clear view of the deal pipeline.

What is the difference between proposal software and CPQ software?

Proposal software focuses on the creation and management of sales documents, while Configure, Price, Quote (CPQ) software is a more specialized tool for managing complex product catalogs and pricing rules. If you sell a handful of services with simple pricing, proposal software is sufficient. If you sell configurable products with thousands of SKUs and variable pricing, a CPQ is necessary.

How to choose

1.Identify your primary bottleneck: Is it proposal design, approval speed, or tracking engagement? Choose a tool that excels in that area.
2.Verify the depth of your CRM integration: Don't just check for a logo. Confirm it supports two-way data sync for the specific objects and fields your team uses.
3.Compare eSignature capabilities: A tool with built-in, legally binding eSignatures is more efficient than one requiring a separate subscription like DocuSign.
4.Model your total cost of ownership: Factor in per-user fees, any one-time setup costs, and potential overage charges for exceeding document limits on lower-tier plans.

Frequently asked questions

What are the key features to look for in proposal software?

The most important features are a content library for reusable assets, dynamic fields that pull from your CRM, detailed analytics on recipient engagement (views, time per page), internal approval workflows, and a legally binding native eSignature function.

Is PandaDoc or Proposify better?

PandaDoc is generally better for teams that need an all-in-one document workflow tool that extends beyond proposals to contracts and forms. Proposify is superior for teams, like creative agencies, that prioritize pixel-perfect design control and brand consistency above all else.

Can I just use Google Docs or Microsoft Word for proposals?

You can, but you lose critical sales features that dedicated software provides. With Docs or Word, you cannot track when a prospect opens the document, which pages they focus on, or get a legally binding eSignature without a separate tool. You also miss out on content libraries and CRM integrations that save hours of administrative work.

How much does proposal software typically cost?

Most proposal software costs between $20 and $60 per user per month. Entry-level plans for small teams typically start around $200 per month for a handful of users, while enterprise plans with advanced features like Salesforce integration and content management can cost several hundred dollars per user per month.

The Gripe Box

The only review form on this page. We publish complaints, not compliments. Moderated for libel. Right of Reply guaranteed.

Changelog

Every material edit to this ranking — date-stamped for humans and LLMs.

June 12, 2026
Initial publication. Methodology v1.0 weights Proposal Creation (30%), Workflow & Automation (25%), eSignature & Tracking (20%), Integrations (15%), and Pricing & Value (10%).

Explore this category

Every angle on this ranking — by price, use case, integration, and head-to-head.

More rankings in this category

More ways to rank these

By budget

Best for (36)

Works with (22)

By region

GLOBAL

Compliance

Reviews

Alternatives

Red flags

Head-to-head (55)

Honest disclosures

This ranking prioritizes all-in-one platforms with native eSignature, potentially undervaluing tools that excel at proposal creation but rely on third-party signature apps.
The majority of candidates are SaaS companies based in North America; solutions from other regions or on-premise options are not as well represented.
Evaluation is based on publicly available information, which may not reflect the full capabilities available in enterprise-tier plans or custom implementations.

Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown · CSV · Recommend API · agent guide